Allegations of Research Misconduct

Help: Journal of Community Service (HJCS) is committed to protecting the integrity, reliability, and credibility of the scholarly record. The journal takes all allegations of research misconduct and publication misconduct seriously, whether concerns arise before or after publication.

HJCS follows internationally recognized principles of publication ethics and uses established publication-ethics practices, including relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), when assessing and responding to allegations of misconduct. The journal maintains procedures for handling concerns raised by authors, reviewers, editors, readers, research participants, institutions, whistleblowers, or other credible parties.

1. What Constitutes Research Misconduct?

Research misconduct refers to serious violations of research integrity that may compromise the reliability, originality, or ethical integrity of scholarly work.

Depending on the circumstances, misconduct may include:

• Fabrication — making up research data, participants, results, observations, or other research information.
• Falsification — manipulating research materials, procedures, data, results, or reporting in a way that misrepresents the research.
• Plagiarism — using another person's words, ideas, data, images, or intellectual contributions without appropriate acknowledgment.
• Duplicate or redundant publication — publishing substantially overlapping work without appropriate disclosure.
• Simultaneous submission — submitting substantially the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time.
• Improper authorship — including guest, gift, honorary, or ghost authorship, or excluding legitimate contributors.
• Undisclosed conflicts of interest that could affect the interpretation or publication of research.
• Citation manipulation, including coercive or irrelevant citation practices intended to influence citation metrics.
• Peer-review manipulation, including falsifying reviewer identities or interfering improperly with the peer-review process.
• Image, figure, or data manipulation that creates a misleading representation of research findings.
• Misrepresentation of community participation or impact, particularly where claims about community engagement or outcomes are unsupported.
• Ethical violations involving research participants or communities, including failure to obtain required consent or inappropriate disclosure of confidential information.

COPE's publication-ethics resources specifically address concerns such as plagiarism, redundant publication, fabricated data, authorship problems, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and systematic manipulation of the publication process.

2. Reporting Allegations

Anyone who has a credible concern regarding the integrity of a manuscript or published article in HJCS may report the concern to the Editorial Office.

A report should, where possible, include:

1. The title of the manuscript or published article;
2. The DOI or manuscript identification number, if available;
3. A clear description of the alleged misconduct;
4. Relevant evidence supporting the allegation;
5. Specific passages, data, figures, publications, or other materials related to the concern; and
6. The contact details of the complainant, where the complainant is willing to provide them.

Anonymous reports may also be considered when they contain sufficiently specific and credible information to permit an initial assessment.

HJCS encourages individuals reporting concerns to provide factual evidence rather than speculative or defamatory statements.

3. Confidentiality and Protection of Complainants

HJCS will handle allegations as confidentially as reasonably possible.

The identity of a complainant or whistleblower will not be disclosed unnecessarily. Information will be shared only with individuals who need it to assess or investigate the concern.

The journal will not tolerate retaliation, intimidation, harassment, or other inappropriate treatment of individuals who raise concerns in good faith.

At the same time, knowingly submitting false, malicious, or defamatory allegations may itself constitute inappropriate conduct.

4. Initial Editorial Assessment

Upon receiving an allegation, the Editor-in-Chief or designated editor conducts a preliminary assessment to determine:

• whether the concern falls within the journal's responsibility;
• whether the allegation is sufficiently specific to warrant further consideration;
• whether supporting evidence is available;
• whether the concern relates to a submitted manuscript or published article; and
• whether immediate action is necessary to protect the integrity of the publication process.

The editor may request additional information or clarification from the complainant before proceeding.

A preliminary assessment does not constitute a finding of misconduct.

5. Investigation of Submitted Manuscripts

When an allegation concerns a manuscript that has not yet been published, HJCS may take one or more of the following actions:

1. Request an explanation from the corresponding author;
2. Request relevant source data, documentation, ethical approval, or other supporting materials;
3. Conduct additional similarity or plagiarism screening;
4. Consult an independent subject-matter expert;
5. Consult members of the editorial board;
6. Suspend the editorial process while the concern is assessed;
7. Contact the author's institution or relevant research-integrity authority where appropriate; or
8. Reject the manuscript if serious misconduct is established or the integrity of the submission cannot be adequately demonstrated.

Where appropriate, HJCS may follow established COPE procedures for suspected ethical problems in submitted manuscripts.

6. Investigation of Published Articles

When an allegation concerns an article that has already been published, HJCS will assess the concern carefully because the integrity of the published scholarly record must be protected.

Depending on the circumstances, the journal may:

• Request clarification from the authors;
• Request underlying data or supporting documentation;
• Consult independent experts;
• Contact the author's institution or research-integrity office;
• Contact relevant funding bodies or other appropriate organizations;
• Publish a correction;
• Publish an Expression of Concern while an investigation is ongoing; or
• Retract the article where the evidence establishes that the publication record is seriously compromised.

COPE recommends that journals have documented procedures for allegations concerning both submitted and published work.

7. Cooperation with Authors and Institutions

Authors are expected to cooperate fully and honestly with reasonable editorial inquiries concerning research integrity.

Where an allegation concerns serious research misconduct that cannot be resolved solely through editorial assessment, HJCS may refer the matter to the relevant author's institution, research organization, ethics committee, or other competent authority.

The journal does not replace the formal investigative authority of a research institution. Institutional investigations may be necessary when the concern involves research conduct, research data, participant protection, or other matters that require access to institutional records or investigative powers.

COPE guidance recognizes the importance of cooperation between journals and research institutions when dealing with research integrity and publication misconduct.

8. Possible Outcomes

Following an assessment or investigation, the journal may determine that:

No Further Action

The allegation is not supported by sufficient evidence or does not constitute a publication-ethics violation.

Author Correction

The authors are asked to correct an identified error that does not invalidate the main findings or integrity of the article.

Manuscript Rejection

A submitted manuscript may be rejected where serious ethical or research-integrity concerns are established.

Expression of Concern

An Expression of Concern may be published when there is a substantial unresolved concern about the reliability or integrity of a published article while further investigation is being undertaken.

Retraction

A published article may be retracted when serious problems are established, including significant fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, duplicate publication, or other circumstances that substantially undermine the reliability or integrity of the publication.

Referral to an Institution

Where appropriate, the matter may be referred to the relevant institution or research-integrity authority for formal investigation.

9. Allegations of Fabrication or Falsification

If credible evidence suggests that research data or findings may have been fabricated or falsified, HJCS may request the authors to provide appropriate supporting documentation, such as:

• Research datasets;
• Field notes;
• Interview or observation records;
• Research instruments;
• Analytical procedures;
• Ethical approval documentation;
• Evidence of community participation; or
• Other materials necessary to verify the reported research.

The journal may seek independent expert advice and may contact the authors' institution if the concern cannot be resolved through editorial inquiry.

10. Allegations of Plagiarism

Where plagiarism is suspected, HJCS may conduct additional similarity analysis and examine the allegedly copied material.

The journal considers the nature, extent, context, and source of similarity, rather than relying solely on a similarity percentage.

Confirmed plagiarism may result in:

• Rejection of a submitted manuscript;
• Requirement for substantial correction where appropriate;
• Retraction of a published article; or
• Referral to the relevant institution in serious cases.

11. Authorship Misconduct

Concerns involving authorship should first be addressed through the authors and their affiliated institutions where appropriate.

Examples include:

• Adding an author who did not make a legitimate contribution;
• Removing a legitimate author without agreement;
• Guest or honorary authorship;
• Ghost authorship;
• Disputes concerning contribution; and
• Unauthorized changes to the author list.

HJCS may suspend publication until authorship concerns have been appropriately resolved.

12. Peer-Review and Editorial Misconduct

HJCS also recognizes that misconduct may involve the peer-review or editorial process.

Concerns may include:

• Fabricated reviewer identities;
• Manipulation of reviewer recommendations;
• Unauthorized disclosure of confidential manuscripts;
• Appropriation of authors' ideas or data;
• Coercive citation;
• Undisclosed conflicts of interest; or
• Systematic manipulation of the publication process.

Such concerns will be treated seriously and may result in suspension of the relevant review or editorial process and further investigation. COPE provides specific guidance on suspected peer-review and publication-process manipulation.

13. Fairness and Presumption of Integrity

An allegation does not automatically constitute proof of misconduct.

HJCS will seek to ensure that all parties are treated fairly and that editorial decisions are based on credible evidence, relevant documentation, and appropriate scholarly and ethical standards.

Authors will normally be given an opportunity to respond to substantive allegations before a final editorial action is taken, except where immediate action is necessary to protect the integrity of the publication process.

14. Post-Publication Concerns

HJCS welcomes responsible post-publication discussion and correction of the scholarly record.

Readers and researchers who identify a substantial error, ethical concern, or possible misconduct in a published article are encouraged to notify the Editorial Office.

Post-publication concerns will be evaluated according to their seriousness and available evidence. Where necessary, the journal may publish a correction, Expression of Concern, or retraction.

15. Editorial Independence

The handling of allegations of research misconduct is independent of commercial considerations, authors' institutional status, nationality, academic position, or potential impact on journal metrics.

The journal's primary objective is to protect the integrity and reliability of the scholarly record.

16. Commitment to Research Integrity

HJCS recognizes that maintaining research integrity is a shared responsibility among authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, institutions, and the wider scholarly community.

The journal is committed to investigating credible allegations carefully, protecting confidentiality, providing procedural fairness, and taking proportionate corrective action where misconduct is established.

HJCS encourages all members of the scholarly community to contribute to a culture of honesty, transparency, accountability, and responsible research.

Research integrity is essential to trustworthy scholarship. HJCS is committed to protecting the credibility of every article published and to maintaining a reliable scholarly record for the benefit of researchers, practitioners, communities, and society.

Recommended policy note

Untuk bagian paling bawah halaman, Bapak dapat menambahkan:

Policy Reference

HJCS's procedures for handling allegations of research and publication misconduct are informed by internationally recognized publication-ethics principles, including the COPE Core Practices, COPE Flowcharts and Infographics, and guidance on cooperation between journals and research institutions. COPE specifically recommends that journals make their procedures for handling allegations of misconduct publicly available and address concerns arising both before and after publication.